🔗 Share this article Relatives' Distress Regarding Shoreline Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Graves Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family. A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations. A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward. “Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.” Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said. Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground. “You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.” “I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.” A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved. “It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.” In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.” Seeking Solutions and Clarity An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious. Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near. “The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.” A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.” He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.” “There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each community.” The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.